Jimmy Carter, probably the
worst and weakest President that we have had during my 52 years here on this
planet, opened up his mouth the other day, and while we must all given a former
President his due, this former Chief Executive should be given the boot for
what he said.
Carter claims that Rep. Joe
Wilson’s outburst against President Obams (see my Rant #84, Sept. 11) was not a
mere voicing of an opinion about health care. No, according to Carter, it had
its links to racism.
The former President
believes that many people are still unnerved about our President being a black
man—he is actually mixed race—and that Wilson’s tirade was a racist one.
Wilson’s son has come out
to say that his father is not a racist, and that the outburst was simply one
having to do with his father’s displeasure at the President’s health care
program.
However reprehensible the
elder Wilson’s actions were, I seriously doubt they were racist.
Why does Carter feel the
need to inject a topic that has nothing to do with the real topic here: people
being upset at the President’s health care proposal. Whether they are wrong
about the proposal or spot on, that is the issue.
Racism has nothing to do
with the health care proposal and it certainly had nothing to do with Wilson
nincompoop behavior.
What Carter has done is
inject a topic that can still be labeled “hot button” into this debate, much
like this topic was dumped into the O.J. Simpson trial several years ago by
Johnny Cochran.
It had no place in that
trial, and it has no place in the current debate.
I would expect such an
opinion to be held by the Al Sharptons and Jesse Jacksons of the world; but for
it to be voiced by a former President is disturbing. I think his credibility is
certainly lacking here.
In fact, President Obama
himself said that the outburst had nothing to do with the color of his skin,
and that should end the argument.Also, remember when President Clinton was in
office, Hillary Clinton also proposed a health care plan, which was shot down,
but somehow, I don't remember people saying that this happened because of
either racism or sexism.
However, this whole episode
brings us back to square one: did people vote for Obama due to his platform, or
did they vote for him because of his race? I would hope it would be for the
former reason, although I have never been too sure about that, especially based
on the way people like Carter act.
And since he is a black
President, are we not allowed to knock him and disagree with him if we feel it
is necessary? Would we do the same if he were white? Are white people to be
called racists if they disagree with what he is saying? I don't remember
minorities being called racists when they disagreed with President Bush.
I am sick and tired of the
“political correctness” that some people think should be accorded our first
black President. I will say it again: if he is a good President, let’s re-elect
him so he can continue to guide us. If he is a bad President, let’s get rid of
him during the next election.
And it has nothing to do
with him being black, green, yellow, or purple.
I will repeat, I think what
Wilson did was reprehensible. However, this is no time to bring up race in this
debate. By doing so, Carter is no better than Wilson, venting his feelings at
an inappropriate time and place.
Personally, I think Carter is ready for the old
age home, and he stands as the only former President in history whose words
should not be taken seriously. He was a do-nothing President, and as a former
President, he is good for nothing.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.