President Obama will be
giving a speech today which is directed at students in our country's schools.
He will stress education, staying with your studies even when times are tough,
and he is describing staying with your education as a duty as an American.
That should be it on this
story, but of course, naysayers feel the need to add in their own two cents to
this speech.
They claim that the
President will be pushing a socialist agenda with the speech, and also pushing
his health care plan. He has steadfastly said that this speech is directed at
students, and will not contain anything having to do with subjects not having
to do with education.
The White House even posted
the text of the speech online so that everyone can get a clear view of what he
is going to say.
Why do people look for
things when they aren't there? Other Presidents have given speeches like this,
including most recently the original President Bush. There was nary a word on
agendas when Bush made his speech. Why are so many people up in arms on the
Obama speech?
Obviously, the honeymoon is
over for Obama and many Americans.
However, what they should
be up in arms about is the "Get Schooled: You Have the Right"
television special that will be broadcast tonight on a number of cable networks,
including Nickelodeon and TV Land. Its airing is timed to coincide with the
speech, and will air when kids are home from their studies.
The guests on the show talk
about the role education has played in their lives. This is a good concept, but
the guest list ... well, I think they could have picked better people.
Did you see who will be on
the show? Among the guests are Kelly Clarkson, LeBron James, and Bill Gates.
Each one of them
circumvented the normal credo of "the more education you have, the more
chances you will have in life" to achieve lasting fame in their chosen
fields.
I had no idea about Kelly
Clarkson's background, so I had to go on Wikipedia to find out about this, I
learned that her mother was a first grade teacher. So far, so good ... but then
I read on ...
"Upon high school
graduation, Clarkson was offered full scholarships to The University of Texas
at Austin, University of North Texas, and Berklee, but decided against college
because she had "already written so much music and wanted to try it on her
own," and she figured "you're never too old to go to college."
Now, let's follow the
bouncing ball ... LeBron James is a spectacular basketball player, perhaps the
NBA's best overall player. However, educationally, he has just a high school
education. If he went through normal channels, he would have gone to college
after high school, played for a major school, and then get drafted by an NBA
team. No, he didn't go this route. He was so good as a high school player that
he was drafted by the Cleveland Cavaliers as a teenager. As it is, since he had
such a high profile in high school, I wonder how much education he actually
received during those years.
And as for Bill Gates ...
he is the perfect example how oftentimes education can stand in the way of
success. I don't believe he has a college degree--although he did go to Harvard
for a while but did little more than work on their computers and did not
regularly attending classes--but he went on to great success in the computer
field as the founder of Microsoft. If he would have gone for a college degree,
who knows what might have happened? You might not even have the ability to read
this.
Thus, I think that in these
cases, the wrong people are on this show. Should we just settle for high school
educations? Is that what it has come to? And the high school education that
Clarkson, James and Gates received ... how much did all the studying, test
taking, and learning really add to their success?
Yes, people should be up in arms, but not about
what the President is doing today.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.