Total Pageviews

Wednesday, April 18, 2018

Rant 2,126: Lies



In the continuing saga of the Starbucks store which had two loiterers who happened to be black arrested for not buying anything in one of the chain's Philadelphia stores, the company had said it is going to pretty much shut down the chain in the U.S. for an afternoon so that employees can take a "race training" course.

Starbucks said that the aim is to "prevent discrimination" in its stores, but the real aim is to placate protestors and others who believe that the store did wrong when it had the two men arrested for being in the store, wanting to use the bathroom, but not buying anything.

Still not revealed is whether this "you buy, you pee" edict is a chain-wide mandate or just for this particular store or any store that wants to enforce it.

And still not known is whether the two men told store workers why they were there--they were meeting someone else, who, of course, happens to be white--and were to get together, and presumably to include coffee while they met.

However, the oh-so PC Starbucks, a company which wears this nonsensical lifestyle on its sleeve, clearly got bitten by it themselves with this incident.

Starbucks Chief Executive Officer Kevin Johnson pretty much put the onus of the entire incident on the store, which has been overrun by protestors since the incident occurred, not only putting off potential customers, but threatening the very existence of the store and the future of its workers.

The manager who actually made the call--who simply followed some type of policy that was instituted to protect baristas--was not fired, if I have heard correctly, simply transferred to another store. This tells you right there that the manager was simply following policy, whether it is systemwide policy or policy for this store in particular, which probably means that the store had problems with people abusing bathroom privileges and not buying anything, and had to put a rule into place to stop it.

Johnson met with the two men who are at the center of this controversy, and he also met with their attorney. Yes, the ambulance chasers came out in full force on this one, didn't they?

Johnson's apologized for the store's actions, distancing himself and the company from the going ons at this particular Starbucks.

Are you telling me that corporate had no idea that this rule was in place? Again, if it is a chain-wide rule, or even if it is just for this store, are you trying to tell me they knew nothing about it, and it is only now that it is being taken to task?

Yes, the customer is always right, even if the customer isn't really a customer and doesn't actually buy anything.

So, since Starbucks is so unhinged by this entire incident--which if nothing else, shows them to be a bunch of pseudo-PC charlatans who are much like any other business in that they exist to make money--they have chosen May 29 to close their stores in the afternoon and begin this training.

Sure, it will cost them plenty of money to do this--in the millions--but the egg on their face will be fully fried by this time, and you know they will make back their money that they lost the very next day.

But what of the poor, poor coffee-obsessed individuals who come to the store on the afternoon of May 29 to satisfy their coffee fix and find that their favorite coffee place is closed?

"Racial training be damned ... I want my Starbucks coffee!"

Maybe it will be grounds for them to retain their own lawyers, and demand that when they need their Starbucks coffee, their local outlet must be open to serve them, no matter what.

11 comments:

  1. You really are clueless, aren’t you?

    Two men wearing yarmulkes are sitting in Starbucks, waiting for a third man to show up. One asks to use the bathroom, and the hijab-wearing girl behind the counter won’t give him the code because he hasn’t bought anything yet. She asks him to leave the store. When he does not, she summons the police. The patrons in the store are aghast, because none of them has ever been asked to prove they made a purchase before being given the bathroom code. The reason for the code on the bathroom door is to keep junkies from shooting up and passing out in there, and the girl has been told to call the cops only if someone is being unruly and disruptive to the point where everyone’s safety is being threatened. It was clear to everyone in the room that the Starbucks employee was guilty of religious discrimination and selective enforcement of the rules, and that she singled the two men out because of their yarmulkes.

    If the incident happened as I described, you’d be screaming your head off, not recycling white privilege BS about bathroom rules and two men who happened to be black.

    ReplyDelete
  2. It isn't surprising that you think patrons of Starbucks are "hoity-toity".

    ReplyDelete
  3. Baloney. I would feel the same way I do now. And what you described didn't happen, and thus, you are only using it to justify your own white guilt beliefs.

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Hoity Toity" in the sense that many feel they are just oh-so entitled and privileged. Spend $6 or more on a cup of coffee? No, your average person doesn't get their coffee there. My wife goes on occasion, she actually prefers Dunkin' Donuts, and you know what? This whole "coffee is my life" status symbol thing is pretty idiotic, don't you think?

    ReplyDelete
  5. What I am wondering is why you backed off your characterization of Starbucks' patrons as"hoity-toity" taking it right out of this essay?

    ReplyDelete
  6. Honestly, I don't even remember taking it out, but if I did, I did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "No,your average person doesn't get their coffee there." If that were true, then there wouldn't be a Starbucks on what seems like every corner.

      Delete
  7. Are you done micro-managing every word, phrase and thought I have here? It is getting kind if boring at this point.

    ReplyDelete
  8. You may want to reconsider....http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/employees-fired-nj-gym-racial-profiling-report-article-1.3942390. Two black men were racially profiled at an LA Fitness in New Jersey.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I never said racial profiling does not exist, which of course you didn't see, but I said in this particular case, I didn't believe it existed. You are constantly trying to prove your points, but you simply do not get mine, or refuse to get mine. And yes, the more you do it, the while guilt is showing. Why should you have such guilt?

    ReplyDelete
  10. I think we have all said enough on this subject, so any further posts on it will be deleted.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.