Why are they changing the
way we receive television? The changeover from analog to digital reception is
one of the most ridiculous things that has been foisted on the public in years.
Yes, digital transmission
brings better picture and sound to your television, but honestly, if you don't
have a large-screen, top of the line receiver, you will never know the
difference.
I understand that the
government wants to use the analog channels for other things, but as the date
grows closer to full digital transmission — June 12, I believe — does the
general public really need this?
Cable and satellite viewers
are pretty much covered during this shift, but those receiving their signal
from the old fashioned rabbit ears are in for a shock when they can't get
television by mid-June. And even if they sign up and get the converter box,
from what I hear there is no guarantee that they will be able to receive the
broadcasts, because the digital signal does not travel as well as the analog
signal does.
The government has funded a
program to allow the public to buy the converter boxes at little or no cost,
and when the program ran out of money, the President pushed back the changeover
date from February to June. But I will bet that many people still don't
understand what will happen on June 12.
Not only that, but don't
you think the consumer electronics companies had something to do with this
changeover from analog to digital? I mean, they are benefitting from the
hysteria around this, as people trashed perfectly good TVs to purchase new ones
that can get the signal, and for this ability, they paid five or six times what
TVs used to cost.
The whole thing seems to be
unnecessary. Why can't stations have both analog and HD transmissions? The
public won't have to cave into hysteria, and there is plenty of available
bandwith for the government to do whatever it has planned for the analog area.
Yes, sometimes I long for the old-fashioned
Channels 2 to 13, the rabbit ears, and the old circular UHF antenna. It just
seemed so much easier — even with the ghosts.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.